For years now, something has bothered me about the user interface of Flickr, but only now have I taken the initiative and fled for pastures new.
I've been a member of the site since their pre-Yahoo days. A startup can be forgiven its UI errors I think, an independent outfit deserves the benefit of the doubt.
I have stuck with them ever since, partially because it's the de facto photo-sharing site and because staying put is less hassle than moving. Part of me hoped that they would catch up with the intuitive world of web 2.0 interfaces, but it never happened.
I would now like to provide examples of why it has always bothered me, but I stumble here. In a nutshell, every time I want to do something, I have to click around and try a few options before I get to the particular edit screen I need. Obviously daily use would eradicate this problem, but the only other time I've found that necessary is on bespoke business systems or archaic/proprietary databases I used in my youth. I shouldn't need training to use a photo-sharing site, especially one I've paid for for the last four years.
Spurred on by an email reminding me to renew my 'pro' subscription, I decided to look at the only other place I stow my photos, Google+. In its former guise of Google Picasa Web, I used it to hold what I considered to be my better photos.
The only thing stopping me was what I thought might be Google's more limited feature list. After all, Picasa Web is one of many Google products, how could it be as good as a dedicated site set up by dedicated developers?
I considered the elements of Flickr that I used (and in some cases infuriated me) and looked for equivalents on Picasa/Google+. It boiled down to Exif data and geotagging. This obviously won't be the same for everyone. The community aspect, for example, is important for some. My photos were never good enough to receive comments and I wasn't an active participant in groups, so that was no loss for me.
Google's geotagging is far superior to to Flickr's Yahoo! maps implementation, and Exif data is just as available as it is on Flickr. People can also leave comments if they feel compelled to. Every box ticked.
The next step was the migration. There are a few bits of software available to automate this process. After trying a couple, I found that Migratr offered the best solution. It downloads everything* from Flickr, keeping Exif and location data, albums/sets, as well as titles and descriptions**. I am aware that I'm becoming asterisk happy.
Migratr is free, but hasn't been updated or supported in a while. It does work, but requires perseverance and the odd restart. This is far preferable to the manual alternative, or paying for the likes of Downloadr. Once everything is retrieved from Flickr, it'll then upload it to Picasa for you. It supports a number of other photo sites, if you happen to swing that way.
For 5.75 of your American dollars, Google has provided an extra 20gig of storage that I can use for whatever I want. Compared to the USD24.95 for a pro account on Flickr, this presents very good value for money.
Much to my chagrin, just as soon as I broadcast on Twitter that I'd made the change, @wrighty alerted me to a blog post announcing changes to Flickr. It remains to be seen if these meet my intangible issues, but it will take something quite spectacular to make me move back again.
*It took a few goes. ** Titles are converted to filenames, descriptions to captions.